Closed skipdavis1117 closed 4 years ago
Hello, @skipdavis1117. I'm sorry for such experience, there's clearly something off. I'll put down a test for the response patching feature and investigate the possible cause of the issue you're experiencing. Please stay tuned for updates.
@skipdavis1117 Hello, can you post the mock code and the startup configuration of the program or keep screenshots of the browser or more detailed information?
The main cause for this issue is that the req
argument that response resolver provides is not 1-1 compatible with the RequestInit
type that window.fetch()
expects. This may lead to all sort of quirks, potentially including this issue.
There is also one detail to keep in mind: any requests performed from the client-side are processed via MSW. That includes the window.fetch(req)
you may want to perform as a part of your response resolver to get an original response. In case you are mocking the same URL you would like to hit as a part of response resolver, it would throw MSW into an infinite loop. See:
composeMocks(
rest.get('https://api.github.com/users/:username', async (req, res) => {
const original = await fetch(req.url, req)
})
)
Requesting
https://api.github.com/users/octocat
matches the request handler in the schema, so MSW attempts to mock the response. As a part of mocking you perform an actualfetch()
to the same URI. That request is again matched against the mocked schema, and MSW attempts to mock it.
In order to prevent this loop I suggest two things:
ctx.fetch()
utility. This way such requests are evident and allow MSW to distinguish between mock/non-mock scenario.ctx.fetch()
under the hood, so that mockServiceWorker.js
would check for the flag and bypass such requests.At the moment I'm thinking of what such flag can be and how to set it on the request object to preserve request semantics. I've tried using a custom header, but then it may result into preflight request violations from CORS policy. I'd appreciate any feedback on this.
The implementation is released in 0.9.0
.
Please see the updated Response patching recipe in the documentation.
In order to use response patching please perform a request to the actual resource via ctx.fetch()
utility function. Here's a tested example of response patching in action:
ctx.fetch()
over window.fetch()
?Using ctx.fetch()
implicitly sets a special header on the request that, whenever present, tells MSW to bypass this request and actually perform it. You can still use regular fetch()
, but requests performed with it will be subjected to mocking.
@skipdavis1117, could you please update to 0.9.0
and let me know if following the example in the docs works for you? Thanks.
It works great. I love this project. It has huge potential for my team. Much appreciated.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:53 AM Artem Zakharchenko < notifications@github.com> wrote:
The implementation is released in 0.9.0. Resolution
Please see the updated Response patching https://redd.gitbook.io/msw/recipes/response-patching recipe in the documentation.
In order to use response patching please perform a request to the actual resource via ctx.fetch() utility function. Here's a tested example of response patching in action:
https://github.com/open-draft/msw/blob/39e2e3fc0f1120496ed9337a01834fd4e51be50f/test/rest-api/response-patching.mocks.ts#L3-L31 Why ctx.fetch() over window.fetch()?
Using ctx.fetch() implicitly sets a special header on the request that, whenever present, tells MSW to bypass this request and actually perform it. You can still use regular fetch(), but requests performed with it will be subjected to mocking.
@skipdavis1117 https://github.com/skipdavis1117, could you please update to 0.9.0 and let me know if following the example in the docs works for you? Thanks.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-draft/msw/issues/66#issuecomment-601257814, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO2GAK5RFW5GRDCDTTFB6PLRII5XHANCNFSM4LOY6JAA .
@skipdavis1117, warms my heart to hear that! Thank you and hope that MSW keeps up with your team's expectations. Looking forward to hear some feedback post usage.
Thank you so much for that example! I already implemented MSW in our Nextjs project.
But I have one question: When adding response patching, I always get a Request with GET/HEAD method cannot have body
error. But only on the server-side of Nextjs. Any ideas why this is happening? For client-side requests, everything works fine...
Hey, @hauptrolle. Could you please open a new issue regarding this server-side behavior in NextJS? I'd kindly ask you to provide a minimal reproduction repository so we can look into it and solve it. Looking forward to that!
@kettanaito Thank you for your fast response. I was able to create a reproducible demo and opened an issue :) https://github.com/mswjs/msw/issues/361 Feel free to have a look!
I am using the create-react-app in this project. Following the documentation (https://redd.gitbook.io/msw/recipes/response-patching) and through various combinations of attempts to get it working, I either end up with errors like: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'entries' of undefined at ServiceWorkerContainer. (index.js:1828)
or if I reconstruct the fetch call properly, it creates an infinite loop and still reports errors.
"devDependencies": { "msw": "^0.8.2" }