mszostok
commented
2 years ago Hi, thanks for your PR. I agree that the missing owner is a valid case and syntax checker shouldn't report it.
Nevertheless, I wanted to keep it, so I just moved this check under owner checker and made it optional. In this way, validator may work in a picky when needed. (fixed by https://github.com/mszostok/codeowners-validator/pull/113)
For more info, please see my comment here: https://github.com/mszostok/codeowners-validator/issues/94#issuecomment-1037515981 🙂
Description
Changes proposed in this pull request:
This PR removes the missing owner syntax check, as this is a valid use case to explicitly specify that a path has no owner.
Related issue(s)
Resolves #94