100,000 items for benchmark too small?

mtak- / swym

Efficient transactional memory in rust.

MIT License

209 stars 6 forks source link

100,000 items for benchmark too small? #2

Open simonhf opened 5 years ago

simonhf commented 5 years ago

With only 100k items in the benchmark, all the items could be held in the 8 MB cache, which would result in misleading performance, or? Can you kindly post a similar benchmark but with say, 10M or 100M items? Thanks!

mtak- commented 5 years ago

It's possible the whole tree would all fit in L3 cache. I'm in favor of more benchmarks 👍