Closed jmbp closed 4 years ago
Hi Jose,
for me, plotting odf sections works for triclinic, e.g.
plot(unimodalODF(orientation('Euler',[10 20 20; 10 10 10; 30 10 20]*degree,crystalSymmetry('1', [1 2 3], [80 70 90]*degree)),'halfwidth',10*degree),'sections',6,'silent','sigma')
Did you check if you have any plotting issues?
set(gcf,'renderer','zBuffer')
might help! It's in the FAQ.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
Could you please post the pole figure plots?
Hi all again,
MTEX works fine plotting odf sections, even triclinic symmetry. But it doesn´t calculate well the triclinic ODF from pole figure data, using the command calcODF
.
Rüdiger, your code works as well. But, where does your data come from? From EBSD, pole figure data...?
I tried restarting the plot, but the problem still remains.
Cheers, Jose M. Benitez-Perez
Hi Jose, I was just wondering if it was a plotting problem - the empty plot looked sort of familiar, but that's obviously not the case - and I missed the NaN. Cheers, Rüdiger
Could you please post the raw pole figures?
Hello,
I'm trying to estimate the andesine ODF form pole figure data. Previously, I worked with other minerals and MTEX calculates very well the experimental PF with the command
loadPoleFigure
and the ODF withcalcODF
. But when I use this for andesine (triclinic symmetry) the c-routine begin to iterate and calculate an higher value than previous and finally appears a negative value (-1.#INDE+000).This appears in the command windows:
I show you my script:
Obiously, the ODF plotted it's empty.
Cheers,
Jose M. Benitez-Perez