mtozsahin / bounswe2015group5

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bounswe2015group5
0 stars 0 forks source link

Review request for test cases 5 and 6 #101

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Please review test cases 5 and 6 and state your recommendations/opinions 
explicitly under the issue.

Thanks.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by buket.yi...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 12:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think we should use the tabular format for only the steps part. 

You should also enter
Module Name
Description
Test Designed By
Test Design Date
Test Executed By
Test Execution Date
fields. 

In the steps, there should be fields for (to be filled later) Actual 
Result, Status (Pass/Fail), and Notes

Original comment by mustafat...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 12:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
In the test case 5, the user should add content (into a text box) for 
contribution, not only tags. And as a result, the content will be shown on the 
case page. 

You should also specify a field for test data to be entered (like into a 
textbox, or menu item, etc..)

Original comment by mustafat...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 1:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Test cases were updated. 

Original comment by buket.yi...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 9:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Also in Test Case ID: TC6

Rating should be done in terms of accuracy and efficiency separately.

Original comment by mehmetbu...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 1:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I will not change anything related to rating scale ( accuracy, efficiency) to 
provide consistency between test case and use case. 

Original comment by buket.yi...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 6:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Done. 

Original comment by buket.yi...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2015 at 7:01