🚀 Here's the PR! #139

See Sweep's progress at the progress dashboard!

💎 Sweep Pro: I'm using GPT-4. You have unlimited GPT-4 tickets. (tracking ID: b0abe4f400)

[!TIP] I can email you next time I complete a pull request if you set up your email here!

Actions (click)

[ ] ↻ Restart Sweep

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I think are relevant in decreasing order of relevance (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description.

https://github.com/mufidu/booku/blob/10bf7e6bac74e86f590913bc0b726c7ea7175321/utils/validateInput.js#L1-L16

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

[X] Modify utils/validateInput.js ✓ https://github.com/mufidu/booku/commit/1b1bd3313598b185e556ee29333630c3000b27df Edit
Modify utils/validateInput.js with contents:
• Confirm that the `validateInput` function uses a switch case structure for input validation, as shown in the provided snippet. This structure is already in place and correctly implements the validation for 'username', 'email', and 'password'.
• Review the regular expressions used for validation to ensure they meet the current standards and security practices. No changes are suggested here unless a review indicates an issue with the current expressions.
• Add comments above each case block to describe what each validation case does. This enhances readability and maintainability. For example, add a comment above the 'username' case: "// Validates that the username is 3-20 characters long and can contain letters, numbers, and underscores."
• Ensure there is a default case that throws an error for an invalid validation type, which is already implemented as per the snippet. This is crucial for catching errors when an unsupported type is passed to the function.
• Consider adding a new case for future validation types as a placeholder. For example, if there's anticipation of adding phone number validation, add a commented-out case block: "// case 'phone': // TODO: Implement phone number validation". This step is optional but can be helpful for future development.
• Test the `validateInput` function thoroughly to ensure that the refactoring did not introduce any bugs. This involves running existing tests in the `test/` directory that relate to user input validation, such as `user.test.js` and `profile.test.js`.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -1,16 +1,23 @@
-const validateUsername = (username) => {
-  const regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9_]{3,20}$/;
-  return regex.test(username);
-};
-
-const validateEmail = (email) => {
-  const regex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
-  return regex.test(email);
-};
-
-const validatePassword = (password) => {
-  const regex = /^(?=.*[A-Za-z])(?=.*\d)[A-Za-z\d]{8,}$/;
-  return regex.test(password);
+const validateInput = (type, value) => {
+  switch (type) {
+    // Validates that the username is 3-20 characters long and can contain letters, numbers, and underscores.
+    case 'username':
+      const regexUsername = /^[a-zA-Z0-9_]{3,20}$/;
+      return regexUsername.test(value);
+    // Validates that the email is in a proper format.
+    case 'email':
+      const regexEmail = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
+      return regexEmail.test(value);
+    // Validates that the password is at least 8 characters long, contains at least one letter and one number.
+    case 'password':
+      const regexPassword = /^(?=.*[A-Za-z])(?=.*\d)[A-Za-z\d]{8,}$/;
+      return regexPassword.test(value);
+    // Placeholder for future validation types (e.g., phone number validation)
+    // case 'phone':
+    //   TODO: Implement phone number validation
+    default:
+      throw new Error('Invalid validation type');
+  }
 };

 module.exports = { validateUsername, validateEmail, validatePassword };

[X] Running GitHub Actions for utils/validateInput.js ✓ Edit
Check utils/validateInput.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for 1b1bd3313598b185e556ee29333630c3000b27df:

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review

I have finished reviewing the code for completeness. I did not find errors for sweep/refactor_validateinput_utils_to_use_swit_ab3f3.

🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:

New dashboard launched for real-time tracking of Sweep issues, covering all stages from search to coding.
Integration of OpenAI's latest Assistant API for more efficient and reliable code planning and editing, improving speed by 3x.
Use the GitHub issues extension for creating Sweep issues directly from your editor.

💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. ^{Something wrong? Let us know.}

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

mufidu / booku

Sweep: Refactor validateInput utils to use switch case #134

Details

🚀 Here's the PR! #139

Actions (click)

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review