🚀 Here's the PR! #84

See Sweep's progress at the progress dashboard!

💎 Sweep Pro: I'm using GPT-4. You have unlimited GPT-4 tickets. (tracking ID: 830850c0e6)

[!TIP] I can email you next time I complete a pull request if you set up your email here!

Actions (click)

[ ] ↻ Restart Sweep

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I think are relevant in decreasing order of relevance (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description.

https://github.com/mufidu/booku/blob/3ca443b7d82b4d67216c461d9b560d8f341bc059/test/booksByAuthor.test.js#L1-L35

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

[X] Modify test/booksByAuthor.test.js ✓ https://github.com/mufidu/booku/commit/3168bc30e785c270364962099a95539d467567b6 Edit
Modify test/booksByAuthor.test.js with contents:
• Add a new test case within the `describe('GET /books/author/:authorName', () => { ... })` block to handle invalid author names.
• The test case should be named `it('should handle invalid author names gracefully', async () => { ... })`.
• Within the test case, define a variable `const invalidAuthorName = '@!#Invalid123';` to simulate an invalid author name input.
• Use `chai.request(server).get(`/books/author/${invalidAuthorName}`).set('Authorization', `Bearer ${token}`);` to make a request to the server with the invalid author name.
• Assert that the response status is either `400` (Bad Request) or `200` (OK) with an empty array, depending on how the backend is expected to handle such cases. This decision should be based on the existing application logic and the desired behavior for handling invalid inputs.
• If expecting a `400` status, use `expect(res).to.have.status(400);` and optionally check for an error message in the response body that indicates the nature of the error.
• If expecting a `200` status with an empty array, use `expect(res).to.have.status(200);` followed by `expect(res.body).to.be.an('array').that.is.empty;` to assert that the response is an empty array.
• This test will ensure that the endpoint is resilient against invalid author name inputs and behaves predictably, enhancing the application's overall robustness.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -26,6 +26,15 @@
     res.body.forEach(book => {
       expect(book.author).to.equal(authorName);
     });
+
+  it('should handle invalid author names gracefully', async () => {
+    const invalidAuthorName = '@!#Invalid123';
+    const res = await chai.request(server).get(`/books/author/${invalidAuthorName}`).set('Authorization', `Bearer ${token}`);
+    expect(res).to.have.status(200).or.have.status(400);
+    if (res.status === 200) {
+      expect(res.body).to.be.an('array').that.is.empty;
+    }
+  });
   });

   it('should return an empty array for a non-existing author', async () => {

[X] Running GitHub Actions for test/booksByAuthor.test.js ✓ Edit
Check test/booksByAuthor.test.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for 3168bc30e785c270364962099a95539d467567b6:

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review

I have finished reviewing the code for completeness. I did not find errors for sweep/create_unit_test_for_invalid_string_in_b.

🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:

New dashboard launched for real-time tracking of Sweep issues, covering all stages from search to coding.
Integration of OpenAI's latest Assistant API for more efficient and reliable code planning and editing, improving speed by 3x.
Use the GitHub issues extension for creating Sweep issues directly from your editor.

💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. ^{Something wrong? Let us know.}

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

mufidu / booku

Sweep: Create unit test for invalid string in books by author endpoint #83

Details

🚀 Here's the PR! #84

Actions (click)

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review