🚀 Here's the PR! #86

See Sweep's progress at the progress dashboard!

💎 Sweep Pro: I'm using GPT-4. You have unlimited GPT-4 tickets. (tracking ID: 610b73639a)

[!TIP] I can email you next time I complete a pull request if you set up your email here!

Actions (click)

[ ] ↻ Restart Sweep

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I think are relevant in decreasing order of relevance (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description.

https://github.com/mufidu/booku/blob/f73bd76c3414612a302aa964ada0fb14cd0de17c/test/bookCategory.test.js#L19-L65

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

[X] Modify test/bookCategory.test.js ✓ https://github.com/mufidu/booku/commit/a18d7e99791fbc618cdbb7a15332e96db729aaf4 Edit
Modify test/bookCategory.test.js with contents:
• Add a new `describe` block within the `describe('GET /books/category/:categoryName', () => { ... })` block to specifically test the handling of invalid category names.
• Inside this new `describe` block, add an `it` test case titled 'should return a 400 status code with an appropriate error message for an invalid category name'.
• In this test case, use `chai.request(server)` to make a GET request to `/books/category/!nvalidC@tegoryName` (or any other string that would be considered invalid).
• Set the 'Authorization' header with a valid `Bearer ${token}`.
• Use `.end((err, res) => { ... })` to handle the response.
• Inside the `.end` callback, assert that `expect(res).to.have.status(400);` to check for the 400 Bad Request status code.
• Also, assert that the response body contains an appropriate error message indicating that the category name is invalid. This can be done using `expect(res.body.error).to.equal('Invalid category name.');` assuming the application is modified to return such an error message for invalid category names.
• This modification directly addresses the issue by ensuring there's a test case that checks the application's behavior when receiving an invalid category name, thus improving the test coverage and helping to catch potential bugs related to input validation.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -30,6 +30,19 @@
                     res.body.forEach(book => {
                         expect(book.category).to.equal('Fantasy');
                     });
+
+    describe('Handling invalid category names', () => {
+        it('should return a 400 status code with an appropriate error message for an invalid category name', done => {
+            chai.request(server)
+                .get('/books/category/!nvalidC@tegoryName')
+                .set('Authorization', `Bearer ${token}`)
+                .end((err, res) => {
+                    expect(res).to.have.status(400);
+                    expect(res.body.error).to.equal('Invalid category name.');
+                    done();
+                });
+        });
+    });
                     done();
                 });
         });

[X] Running GitHub Actions for test/bookCategory.test.js ✓ Edit
Check test/bookCategory.test.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for a18d7e99791fbc618cdbb7a15332e96db729aaf4:

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review

I have finished reviewing the code for completeness. I did not find errors for sweep/create_unit_test_for_invalid_string_in_b_a5db1.

🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:

New dashboard launched for real-time tracking of Sweep issues, covering all stages from search to coding.
Integration of OpenAI's latest Assistant API for more efficient and reliable code planning and editing, improving speed by 3x.
Use the GitHub issues extension for creating Sweep issues directly from your editor.

💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. ^{Something wrong? Let us know.}

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

mufidu / booku

Sweep: Create unit test for invalid string in books by category endpoint #85

Details

🚀 Here's the PR! #86

Actions (click)

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review