Closed prakhargupta1 closed 8 months ago
For 2. shall we replace the component type with the component name? Can you benchmark what other tools do here?
For 2. shall we replace the component type with the component name? Can you benchmark what other tools do here?
Checked appsmith, retool and superblocks and they all show the component name.
For 1. there are some considerations
For 2. I'm opening https://github.com/mui/mui-toolpad/pull/1818
I think 2 would be the best approach as it leads to a more integrated and contextual UX. Let's try to solve it that way, I am adding design:UX
label for further exploration.
Marking it closed as we have started showing 'property name'. It gives the needed context.
Duplicates
Latest version
Summary 💡
Text1
in this case: