mukulyadav49 / macfuse

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/macfuse
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

After updating from sshfs.app to macfuse the mounts are all read only #310

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have been using sshfs.app for over 6 months. Today I updated everything by 
downloading 
macfuse. Initially every seems to work properly. 

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Mount to a linux server: 
/Applications/sshfs.app/Contents/Resources/sshfs-static 
andra@aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:/ /mnt/mountpoint -oreconnect,volname=<new_mount>

2. cd /mnt/mountpoint

3. ls

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The expected output is a listing which shows write permissions. Instead the 
access is readonly. 
(ie.:
total 40
drwxr-xr-x    12 andra  andra   408 Jun 26  2007 .
drwxr-xr-x   186 andra  andra  6324 Jan  9 11:33 ..
drwxr-xr-x     4 andra  andra   136 Jun 26  2007 English.lproj
drwxr-xr-x    13 andra  andra   442 Jun 26  2007 HIFramework
-rw-r--r--     1 andra  andra   771 Jun 26  2007 Info.plist

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
MacFUSE-Core-10.4-1.3.0 / Mac OS X version 10.4.11

Please provide any additional information below.
I have tested this on different servers, even on some where I loggedin with 
root. When I used 
sshfs as a stand-alone application previously, this read=only problem did not 
occur.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by andra.wa...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2008 at 1:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The problem is resolved if the uid is given explicitly. The "problem" was not 
that the permission ware set in 
correct, but that the mount is owned by user and group 1001

Original comment by andra.wa...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2008 at 2:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'm not sure what you're referring to--which "stand-alone application"? The 
only sshfs.app I know is the demo 
GUI wrapper available from this web site, and it needs MacFUSE.

Try using the "-odefer_permisisons" command-line arguments, or, as you did, you 
can try to set the uid 
explicitly. Normally sshfs does try to detect remote uid/gid's, but that can 
fail for one or more reasons.

Original comment by si...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2008 at 6:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by si...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2008 at 6:16