Only geared towards 1v1 play

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please provide any additional information below.
This is a great program, and it has really helped my play a lot, but it isn't 
good for players who want to have a build that plays nicely to cover the 
weaknesses of a different build when the two are paired.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Owen...@live.com on 2 Nov 2010 at 7:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Can you elaborate more on what you are expecting from the application?

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2010 at 9:18

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I think what he means is that the app could be enhanced to simulate 2 
simultaneous builds for a 2v2 match, taking into account that players can share 
resources.

For example:
Player 1 = 10 mutas (goal 1)
Player 2 = 19 roaches (goal 2)

The same for 3v3, etc...

Original comment by amd...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 12:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

2v2 builds and shared resources sound interesting. I'm marking the issue as a 
feature request.

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 12:19

• Added labels: Component-Logic, Component-UI, Priority-Low, Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Priority-Medium, Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Shared resources features heavily in my builds as a top 2v2 player. It would be 
a welcome addition to this program.

Original comment by hugh.lo...@lodestarbpm.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 2:34

[GoogleCodeExporter]

That's exactly what i mean. I play a lot of 3v3 and 4v4 games, and i want to 
have strats that play well into other peoples play. Shared resources is the 
main issue, but i also want to be able to have a build that works for say 3 
players of the same race........ Can you find a way to make it run with 3 
separate entities that all have co-dependent resources and units?

Original comment by Owen...@live.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 5:24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 185 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 19 Jul 2011 at 7:34