search

mullvad / mullvadvpn-app

The Mullvad VPN client app for desktop and mobile
https://mullvad.net/
GNU General Public License v3.0
4.65k stars 329 forks source link

Shadowsocks with v2ray #4090

Open strykenKN opened 1 year ago

strykenKN commented 1 year ago

I do not mean any harm.

I think it's good that you work more on privacy, but unfortunately you have once again thought only of the Ubuntu users, but not the Fedora users. The world does not only consist of Ubuntu users!

Second ... much too complicated and the majority will not use it! Is nice the approach, but so no one wants! and about the console already twice not, that's just for freaks!

If you were serious about privacy, then you would update your app and integrate this possibility! Why do not you use the opportunity to integrate that into your own app ? Can't be that hard for you or can it ? I am a little disappointed.

faern commented 1 year ago

Hi. Sorry, but you need to be more specific. Your post sadly comes off as letting some steam out in a pretty unproductive way right now.

I think it's good that you work more on privacy, but unfortunately you have once again thought only of the Ubuntu users, but not the Fedora users. The world does not only consist of Ubuntu users!

What is it that does not work well on Fedora? we do test the app on Fedora and I'm a fedora user myself. The app should work just as well there as on Ubuntu.

Second ... much too complicated and the majority will not use it! Is nice the approach, but so no one wants! and about the console already twice not, that's just for freaks!

What is too complicated exactly? Using a local socks proxy? Yeah, since it's quite a special use case we have not exposed it in the GUI (yet). But given the constantly changing censorship situation that we currently have, we might expose it in the GUI to make it a bit easier to use.

If you were serious about privacy, then you would update your app and integrate this possibility!

Integrating v2ray has been in our backlog for some time. But we wanted to finish and roll out WireGuard over TCP first. Then other projects got priority. Given how fast it currently changes which obfuscation protocols actually work, we might not focus on any specific one right now. But rather make it easier to run any custom obfuscation by yourself.

MrChocolatine commented 1 year ago

Just in case: https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2022/10/25/v2ray-obfuscation-supported-on-our-bridges/

xxyzz commented 1 year ago

The v2ray-plugin project seems abandoned, and it's using very outdated v2ray-core v4.38.3 which has vulnerabilities fixed in later versions.