Closed willscott closed 2 years ago
So the idea is that these aren't used for codecs, but are magic numbers that may be used... somewhere else, in specific places where we're expecting to talk about ADLs, such as in a field of integer type in a selector extension we're about to propose?
in general i would not expect them to be directly embedded as CIDs, but they are sufficiently cid-adjacent that they should not conflict with other defined multi-codecs, and I believe warrant their own namespace in the multicodec registry in which to be defined and delineated.
Nvm. Apparently we're not using codecs.
this got deprecated in favor strings
These are not used in CIDs regularly, so size is not a primary concern. As such, adding to a high byte range space.