Closed matttbe closed 2 months ago
This has been covered for the msk->fully_established field,, but it looks like it is not the case for the subflow one:
msk->fully_established
msk:
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c: if (!READ_ONCE(msk->fully_established) || net/mptcp/protocol.c: WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, false); net/mptcp/protocol.c: WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, false); net/mptcp/protocol.h: bool fully_established; net/mptcp/protocol.h: READ_ONCE(mptcp_sk(sk)->fully_established); net/mptcp/subflow.c: WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, true);
subflow:
net/mptcp/diag.c: if (sf->fully_established) net/mptcp/options.c: if (subflow->fully_established || snd_data_fin_enable || net/mptcp/options.c: if (likely(subflow->fully_established)) { net/mptcp/protocol.c: if (mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk)->fully_established) net/mptcp/protocol.h: fully_established : 1, /* path validated */ net/mptcp/protocol.h: if (subflow->request_join && !subflow->fully_established) net/mptcp/subflow.c: subflow->fully_established = 1; net/mptcp/subflow.c: return !subflow->fully_established; net/mptcp/subflow.c: new_ctx->fully_established = 1;
This has been covered for the
msk->fully_established
field,, but it looks like it is not the case for the subflow one:msk:
subflow: