multnomah-fellowship / planning

A repo to contain the issues for our Waffle planning board
1 stars 0 forks source link

Mailchimp experiment #109

Open pamdinevaCfA opened 7 years ago

pamdinevaCfA commented 7 years ago

We believe that... a digital receipt of victim rights is useful (makes people feel more competent about their role in the criminal justice system and therefore more empowered)

We will make... an email in Mailchimp that we work with Libby and Co. to send out an one-off basis to a couple of victims and track opens

We will know the hypothesis is valid by... Thursday

Quantitative measure... Something like a 10-20% open rate and a 5-10% CTR feels normal here

Qualitative measure... people seem thankful (maybe we ask for feedback or replies to email) for letting them know their rights have been recorded

Qualitative measure #2...ask Libby and Co. if it spurred any conversation, did they understand their rights better?

alsomanya commented 7 years ago

Stepping back a bit, the overall theme with this email (and other features right now) is "Awareness" — we believe that victims aren't aware of the information they need to effectively get through the process. To that end, we're building features that increase access to information: a digital receipt of their rights, a court date notification tool, connections to resources that can help (per yesterday's meeting), etc.

To measure success for this email, I'd look at signals that indicate that a victim got more information (or the right information) than they had previously. I like your first sentence, though I might modify it to only include the specific thing we're testing — "We believe that... a digital receipt of victim rights makes people feel more competent about their role in the criminal justice system." And then for testing, I'd think about the following:


One final thought: based on the screenshot we looked at in yesterday's meeting, I'd be interested in thinking deeper about ways this email can deliver more "awareness". We all agreed that the language of the rights themselves is complicated and filled with legalese — could we potentially "translate" the rights in this email to plain human speak? i.e. "Here are the rights you selected: [x,y,z]. Here's what that means in English: [a, b, c]" Could we refer a victim to free legal services (other than the DA)? Basically, I think we all believe that the victim rights process is broken for victims. This email goes a long way in addressing that by meeting victims where they are (aka on the internet), but are there other ways to make progress? Could we go beyond digitizing a user experience that needs improvement, and think about a new and better user experience from the beginning? This is getting into pie-in-the-sky territory and may be a strong swing away from what your stakeholders expect, so feel free to ignore my ramblings for the context of this experiment :) But it's something I've been mulling over since our brainstorm last week — happy to discuss!

tdooner commented 7 years ago

Open rates and CTR are good indicators for an email's value, but I hesitate that this email will perform better than industry marketing emails by orders of magnitude. I'm also unclear which industry standard we would compare it to: government emails (is there a standard)?

Totally happy to defer to your expertise on this one, but to explain a bit more about why I am hoping to see good metrics: I was thinking that the email would be treated importantly because of the gravity of the victimization. And so "good metrics" would be relative to a random marketing email... not necessarily compared to other government transactional mail (which is also important to the end-user).

If typos happened between the transfer of the paper form to the DA's CMS, or victims just don't have regular access to check their email, those could significantly impact your metrics

Yeah, regarding deliverability, I totally agree that we are likely to have some typos and addresses that bounce. Ideally we would look at a variant of Open/Clickthrough rates where the denominator is actually deliveries. So a Open-to-Deliver and Click-to-Deliver rate if you will...

For example, Square receipts ask you "how was your experience?" and users can click 😀 or 😕. Could you do something similar to measure awareness?

I like this idea! We actually discussed this specific thing. Maybe it looks like that, maybe we ask for freeform feedback, but yeah I think something like this is a good way to get some direct feedback.

Basically, I think we all believe that the victim rights process is broken for victims. This email goes a long way in addressing that by meeting victims where they are (aka on the internet), but are there other ways to make progress? Could we go beyond digitizing a user experience that needs improvement, and think about a new and better user experience from the beginning?

That'd be great. It's exciting that all our stakeholders are looking at the system from the POV that we need to improve the experience for victims through any means. I think we are moving in the direction of a better experience "from the beginning" with email/SMS interactions, but we will need to keep thinking about this, I agree.

Thanks for all your thoughts. I like the "awareness" focus. It feels apt to describe what we are working on right now.

pamdinevaCfA commented 7 years ago

UPDATE 6/8

We believe that... a digital receipt of victim rights makes people feel more competent about their role in the criminal justice system.

We will make... a one-off digital receipt of victim rights, generated one-by-one by Pam + Tom, using the CRIMES data dump

We will know the hypothesis is valid by... Thursday 6/15

Quantitative measure... 26% open rate and a 4% CTR

Qualitative measure... we get more than 50% positive feedback to the question "was this useful"

Qualitative measure #2...ask the advocates if it spurred any conversation, did they understand their rights better?

pamdinevaCfA commented 7 years ago

@alsomanya @tdooner Re: CTR rates From: Mailchimp marketing benchmarks by industry

Industry Open Click Soft Bounce Hard Bounce Abuse Unsub Government 26.33% 3.62% 0.48% 0.39% 0.01% 0.13%

tdooner commented 7 years ago

Government: 26.33% Open

Yikes, well, I'm glad we didn't aim for 4x the industry average 😀

tdooner commented 7 years ago

Two experiments:

How many people can we reach?

Is reaching them valuable?

Then we test the value of the email by adding features such as court notification or contextual contact information for their advocates.

Then we can make a case for more data.