Open pamdinevaCfA opened 7 years ago
Results: though no evidence was found of other portals giving feedback loops, I found the UK victim "portal" Which is focused on understanding the process and getting help over getting status info. The status-info is likely a conversation with the victim advocate. It seems like they provide a high-touch service more so than a self-serve tool.
It's a contrast to the Canadian portal.
Interesting. Which portals did you look at? (Are there more than UK, Canada, NY, Minnesota?)
It's a contrast to the Canadian portal.
Does this mean that the Canadian portal is more self-serve than high touch, or that it gives status info?
@tdooner Canada, UK, Minnesota and California https://app.mural.ly/t/multnomahfellowship7441/m/multnomahfellowship7441/1496275051344/view/2871427366
Yes Canada gives me a portal to see stuff on the screen, the UK assigns me a person. "If you join you’ll be given a Victim Liaison Officer (VLO) who'll keep you up to date with what’s happening with the offender"
We'll have to confirm what else Canada does when we get a demo, they didn't write a novel about their process like UK. The UK is the most interesting to me because they're very clear and explicit in their value prop:
The UK portal is a larger scale of our original value prop "helping victims navigate the justice system" [in a supporting, educational, empowering, concise way]
We believe that... a digital receipt is valuable
We will make... a competitive analysis of what other victim portals do (Canada, California, Minnesota)
We will have... a meeting with the creators of the Canadian portal and learn more about their rationale behind the features, what did victims care to know around requesting their rights
We will know the hypothesis is valid.. . by a day's worth of research
Qualitative measures... there are many FAQs and notes about confirming/making sure victims have requested their rights
Quantitative measures... >75% have some sort of digital receipt of victim rights