Open davidebeatrici opened 3 years ago
IMHO server country doesn't matter if we have latency. I'd drop server country altogether and only show desired languages and latency.
Also, I just noticed a bug: the servers are correctly ordered by latency, but the value in the Ping
column is not updated.
Personally, I believe Server Country filtering should be retained as a toggleable feature, given that users may only want to compare the given latencies of servers in one region as is usually the case(Useful for particularly large ones without per-country filters such as the North America US Server Country), as well as given that not all servers are set to the region they are actually hosted in.
Besides, from what activity I have seen in the US region, users may prioritize latency at first, but will eventually just keep going back to servers that are preferred above others.
Of course.
IMHO server country doesn't matter if we have latency. I'd drop server country altogether and only show desired languages and latency.
I disagree, there was discussion about why Mumble should not ping all servers always and therefore the correct country origin should still be visible imo. At least we need options:
Also there are some more things to consider: Is it really a good idea to let the server owner choose which country/language they want to be recognized with? I think users should have a way to know where a server really comes from.
The better compromise would be to:
Sidenote: We might also discuss more language distinctions and how they are displayed; for example on many websites there is a distinction between British english and american english.
There are two reasons for that:
@Krzmbrzl Could you give a bit more detail to your thumps down? I mention several different things.
IMHO server country doesn't matter if we have latency. I'd drop server country altogether and only show desired languages and latency.
I disagree, there was discussion about why Mumble should not ping all servers always and therefore the correct country origin should still be visible imo.
It's not like pinging everything constantly is the only alternative. The client could ping all servers once, and then keep updating the top N (e.g. 50/100/configurable).
Is it really a good idea to let the server owner choose which country/language they want to be recognized with? I think users should have a way to know where a server really comes from.
But they do, just by looking at the ping. I don't think any user in e.g. Europe really cares if a server is hosted in a neighboring country. Just which languages are preferred there and whether it's within a reasonable network latency matters.
Similarly, a user on the US east coast may not have a good time using a server on the west coast, despite it being the same country. A user in Canada may prefer a French speaking server instead of an English speaking one, etc.
I think a lot people will not like it, when you suddenly remove the country categories. I can only strongly advice against such a step.
Ok, but what's the use case you have in mind? So far you brought up technical concerns (pinging everything is bad), and maybe a sort of trust concern ("I think users should have a way to know where a server really comes from"), not sure tbh.
You named a good example: Canada. You could have a fantastic combination of country (canada) and language (french or english) to identify a server for you. Also an interesting option would be, if server owners could choose more than just one language, for example english and french.
In general the country category is established (also outside of mumble).
Could you give a bit more detail to your thumps down? I mention several different things.
I will not have the pinging discussion again. This was held elsewhere already and we simply have completely different opinions on that topic. Therefore I do not follow your argument of not pinging servers, making the whole argument afterwards superfluous.
And I also don't like the ideas presented afterwards either. That's why I simply downvoted.
I think a lot people will not like it, when you suddenly remove the country categories. I can only strongly advice against such a step.
That has already been done and was decided upon. But rejection of yours is noted. The country information is still available though, so if you care you still have it. You just don't have to click yourself through the mess of a country tree in order to see which servers are available.
A further note: The country categories are not topic of this issue. So please don't continue arguing about that here. If you feel like this requires some more discussion, please go ahead and create a new discussion for it.
@Krzmbrzl
That has already been done and was decided upon. But rejection of yours is noted. The country information is still available though, so if you care you still have it. You just don't have to click yourself through the mess of a country tree in order to see which servers are available.
Edit: That sounds ok. I just don't want it to be removed completely. Nonetheless I think I have shown an example of how country and language can be very closely related, so it is not so much off-topic as other topics would be.
Now that we solely rely on GeoIP for the server categorization and dropped
registerLocation
(#3328), we should implement a field that defines the accepted languages.That way a user can easily distinguish between servers that are closer and servers on which the desired language is effectively accepted.