In slides of 97f0b49b1fdcd687c1f814d1d70802d0d05972ca, e.g., the historical and do versions of the average treatment effect probabilities look the same, which contradicts the claim that the do version has half of the ATE of the historical ones on the slide from 2 years ago, e.g. here:
In slides of 97f0b49b1fdcd687c1f814d1d70802d0d05972ca, e.g., the historical and do versions of the average treatment effect probabilities look the same, which contradicts the claim that the do version has half of the ATE of the historical ones on the slide from 2 years ago, e.g. here:
https://github.com/munichpavel/risk-ai-workshop/tree/fe4dbfa65fef19d47a48f026178fd2bb678c0865/slides/correlation-causality
Fix this.