Closed Narann closed 2 years ago
I kind of think these coverity scans are mostly bogus. I don't think any of this is new code - it just periodically runs a static analysis on the code and spits out a few warning messages purely as a sales/marketing exercise. If "reg" was ever set to 16,383 we would have real problems. Some of those might point to places in the code where we could improve security by using snprintf() instead of sprintf(), but it's probably not super important
Thanks, closing the issue.
Coverity scan reports few problems.
It's still unclear of those are valid defects or simply Coverity scan fall into a hole.
Feel free to close the ticket.