Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Is this still reproducable?
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 30 Sep 2014 at 6:38
Still reproducible with Linux Mint (LMDE with MATE) stock package (7.4,
--version saying includes patches 1-52) or my own build (7.4 from official dl
site, same configure option).
Additional comments:
1. More likely to occur when navigating with Ctrl-F/Ctrl-B, leaving at least
half of the screen blank.
2. Only gvim is affected. vim is fine.
Original comment by fancymo...@fancymouse.net
on 23 Nov 2014 at 2:15
I can reproduce the issue. Unfortunately, I do not know, why patch 7.3.638
should cause the issue. It looks to me, like the gtk drawing libraries are not
updating the window correctly, because if I see this correctly, Vim requests
redrawing of the complete buffer content. I do not know gtk good enough to
propose a fix though.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 24 Nov 2014 at 9:58
You might want to report that bug also to the Mate developers, because it seems
to be Mate specific (or does it happen with other desktop environments?).
Nevertheless, Here is a simple patch, that forces a redraw in the gtk gui, that
seems to work around the problem. Nevertheless, it would be good, if a
developer with a more found GTK background could have a look at that issue (and
my patch).
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 25 Nov 2014 at 6:31
Attachments:
Thanks for the patch. Although with your patch as is, Ctrl-F/B still breaks.
But after I comment out "if (type >= NOT_VALID)", it now looks good to me.
Original comment by fancymo...@fancymouse.net
on 5 Dec 2014 at 12:04
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 9 Jan 2015 at 12:18
May not be a Mint specific problem... just got a chance to have a try from
Debian Testing (jessie rc1) and it's even worse. The patch still works.
Original comment by fancymo...@fancymouse.net
on 10 Mar 2015 at 10:23
The problem with this approach is, it will make Vim a whole lot slower, since
what it really does it always force a complete redraw. That is most certainly
not what is wanted.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 11 Mar 2015 at 6:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yerv...@gmail.com
on 3 Nov 2012 at 1:33