Closed jisungyoon closed 4 years ago
Yeah, that's a good point. I removed the figure for now.
Also, we can just factorize the matrix directly, and compare the result between node2vec and factorization results.
But, low priority
Also, we can just factorize the matrix directly, and compare the result between node2vec and factorization results.
But, low priority
How long would that take however? it would be a big matrix, ~10,000 x 10,000, so the memory and computation requirements would be big.
Also, we can just factorize the matrix directly, and compare the result between node2vec and factorization results. But, low priority
How long would that take however? it would be a big matrix, ~10,000 x 10,000, so the memory and computation requirements would be big.
In 5 min with this awesome technique. https://research.fb.com/blog/2014/09/fast-randomized-svd/
Also, we can just factorize the matrix directly, and compare the result between node2vec and factorization results. But, low priority
How long would that take however? it would be a big matrix, ~10,000 x 10,000, so the memory and computation requirements would be big.
In 5 min with this awesome technique. https://research.fb.com/blog/2014/09/fast-randomized-svd/
interesting! I haven't seen this yet. Lets keep it low priority, but we can definitely try to run this at some point
Revised mathematical part more precisely.