Open brobrobrob opened 1 week ago
Isn't this a duplicate of #24892 (or vice versa)?
Isn't this a duplicate of #24892 (or vice versa)?
Yes, this is the correct one because it merges into master
This is a draft btw, you don't have to review now! I thought the convention was to mark as 'ready for review' when I am ready for review @Jojo-Schmitz
Those merge commits should not be there, please try a git pull --rebase upstream master
followed by a git push -f
Those merge commits should not be there, please try a
git pull --rebase upstream master
followed by agit push -f
Done
Resolves: #9584
Change NotationInteraction::addTimeSignature to re-select the current measure after running cmdAddTimeSignature
More descriptive variable nomenclature
[x] I signed the CLA
[x] The title of the PR describes the problem it addresses
[x] Each commit's message describes its purpose and effects, and references the issue it resolves
[x] If changes are extensive, there is a sequence of easily reviewable commits
[x] The code in the PR follows the coding rules
[x] There are no unnecessary changes
[ ] The code compiles and runs on my machine, preferably after each commit individually
[ ] I created a unit test or vtest to verify the changes I made (if applicable)