Closed ShalokShalom closed 7 years ago
Hi @ShalokShalom,
The Firefox addon link is already present in the README. I'll add the link re: Opera shortly.
Thanks!
I mean as an icon, like with Chrome. I actually wasnt aware of a Firefox add on, since i trusted this one.
@ShalokShalom I see.
Do you think this README looks better: https://github.com/musically-ut/lovely-forks/tree/improve-readme
Any suggestions on how to improve the text/presentation?
Perfect, this looks super awesome to me.
Can you think about a word (combination), which describes the essence of this tool? If yes, i would replace notable with it.
Hmm, I'll have to think about it.
Do you have any suggestions there?
No, my english is too buggy. :)
I've updated the README but haven't yet come up with a better word than "notable" forks. I'll keep this issue open until we find something better. :)
useful?
"useful" is not quite what describes the other fork the best.
Looking at the examples in the screenshots, the other forks can be compatibility fixes, can be ports to other platforms, or can be a feature branch which the original doesn't have.
The use-case I had in mind was that when the original repo has been abandoned, the fork becomes the next maintained thing, but the examples were far more versatile than merely that.
"useful" just doesn't get that meaning across, I think. "Noteworthy" seems to encompass those use-cases better.
"The use-case I had in mind was that when the original repo has been abandoned, the fork becomes the next maintained thing, but the examples were far more versatile than merely that."
Then mention this in the text as well?
There is support for Firefox and Opera, maybe mention this in the README?
https://addons.opera.com/de/extensions/details/download-chrome-extension-9/
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/lovely-forks/