Open LFSaw opened 7 years ago
should be merged into musikinformatik/Steno
(from the other, now due to repository moving removed discussion):
We all have different taste, it seems :)
Tbh., I find \synthIndex
, \index
, and \nestingDepth
not semantically valid enough to justify their length.
I tried to find abbreviations that are, what I thought, either common (\fb
, \idx), or follow a common scheme. It seems I failed :)
Since Steno
is a livecoding environment, I think it'd be great to have reasonably short yet meaningful names. For an upcoming show, I'll have 10min to create something with Steno and I'd like to spend that time with expressing what I want rather than searching for the right keys (on my keyboard/in the dict) :)
here are proposals:
I think i
and j
are valid alternatives, although it is difficult to deduct from them which one has which meaning:
\synthIndex
), vs.\index
)Since j
is often used nested within a loop using i
, my "Eselbrücke" could be i
represents more cases (case 1.) than j
(case 2.).
I could also imagine \pos
as a replacement for \synthIndex
, since it is (almost) the position in the string...
I think \depth
would be sufficient.
\numChans
?
We all have different taste, it seems :)
maybe! I also change it sometimes. Is idx
used a lot in some world specifically?
Tbh., I find
\synthIndex
,\index
, and\nestingDepth
not semantically valid enough to justify their length.
Yes, you are completely right. They (or their equivalents) should also be methods of the StenoSignal
object, then one gets autocompletion.
numChans
I don't think it's worth those few letters.
pos
yes, maybe pos
and slot
? Or pos
and i
?
depth
yes, depthnitely.
We could use this conversation to discuss what information we could pass to the synth / settings about the syntactic context.
really minor stuff...