Added Canon EOS 40D

[profesorek96]

Please add to main repository.

[rderimay]

I am pretty sure that should be unneeded as -unless we have a bug- the current version supports the 40D (and almost any Canon camera) without config file.

[musselwhizzle]

do most canon's report their x and y pixel locations just like fuji? I'm feeling very left out that nikon didn't.

We need to update the readme with what canon's we support.

[rderimay]

Indeed yes, I was pretty socked to find no infos at all in the Nikon files I have opened. This is crazy simple to implement for them I cannot understand why they did not. The same as Fuji that implemented a lot of stuff in the Exif (af positions, face recognition squares, etc) but did NOT implement the current chosen size if the af point...

[musselwhizzle]

before I merge or decline, l or you can grab his images out of the image repo and test that the current version works there.

[rderimay]

40 D Output:

EXIF | Searching for AF Area Widths -> 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 EXIF | Searching for AF Area Heights -> 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 EXIF | Searching for AF Area X Positions -> 0 -649 649 -1034 0 1034 -649 649 0 EXIF | Searching for AF Area Y Positions -> 562 298 298 0 0 0 -298 -298 -562 EXIF | Searching for AF Points Selected -> 4 EXIF | Searching for { AF Points In Focus } returned nothing

[rderimay]

does he just put some ?

[musselwhizzle]

yes

https://github.com/musselwhizzle/Focus-Points-Sample-Images/tree/master/Canon/EOS%2040D

[rderimay]

ah ok. second

[rderimay]

Works

[rderimay]

[rderimay]

And with rotated, cropped and mirrored ^_^

[musselwhizzle]

to confirm: is it your recommendation to decline this PR.

[rderimay]

yes, all needed info (including width and height) is in the exifs

[musselwhizzle]

declined PR as camera support already exists dynamically.

@profesorek96 - if you find this to be untrue, let's reopen and investigate at that time.