Danappelxx
commented
3 years ago Seems like a no-brainer, I would assume that most implementations already do this and that this was in the original intent of the spec.
I'll wait a few days just in came someone drops by to tell me I'm wrong, though.
jgonggrijp
My follow-up on #82. Although I don't think my suggested changes would be very controversial, there is some slight potential for breakage here. While my own implementation passes the new tests without modifications, I imagine that some implementations might support the implicit iterator only within a section. I'm open to discussion.