Since variant NM000777.3:c.-5-1del leaves the ATG in tact the predicted consequence at protein level is given by the Name Checker is "p.(=)". This is not correct, since the "Kozak sequence" around the ATG is affected the consequence can not be predicted and should be given as "p.?"
Since variant NM000777.3:c.-5-1del leaves the ATG in tact the predicted consequence at protein level is given by the Name Checker is "p.(=)". This is not correct, since the "Kozak sequence" around the ATG is affected the consequence can not be predicted and should be given as "p.?"