Closed littlespex closed 5 days ago
@littlespex is attempting to deploy a commit to the Mux Team on Vercel.
A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.
@littlespex amazing stuff!
First pass I'm noticing a lot of linting-ish diffs. Spacing, quotes, etc. Stuff like that. We do have a yarn lint
command and I do see in the commit messages either you or copilot workspace was making lint commits.
Did our existing eslint config not get applied? Or was the eslint config modified as part of this change?
Those are the result of running the format
script. The code generated by the tools had some sloppy formatting, so I ran npm run format
to normalize it. Is that script still valid?
@dylanjha @heff Does anyone know how to address this Playwright error: https://github.com/muxinc/media-chrome/actions/runs/9289849038/job/25566542757#step:10:23
The test --all
command works for me locally, but something with the install of playwright is preventing CI from completing. I did update the package.json
and yarn.lock
, so I want to make sure these errors weren't introduced by this PR.
@dylanjha @heff Does anyone know how to address this Playwright error: https://github.com/muxinc/media-chrome/actions/runs/9289849038/job/25566542757#step:10:23
The
test --all
command works for me locally, but something with the install of playwright is preventing CI from completing. I did update thepackage.json
andyarn.lock
, so I want to make sure these errors weren't introduced by this PR.
I'm re-running now just in case. I can pull your branch down and test locally as well.
@littlespex looking like the buckshot updates did cause some dependency issues with the test runners. Will require some digging.
@littlespex looks like it's a yarn + playwright binaries issue. https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/5767 Since we had some dependencies still pointing to npmjs registry that were updated to use the yarn registry, I'm wondering if that is the root cause. (We can also go down the path of doing the env setup workarounds if that makes sense)
Those are the result of running the format script. The code generated by the tools had some sloppy formatting, so I ran npm run format to normalize it. Is that script still valid?
@littlespex yeah, the format
script should still be valid. But something seems off because it runs prettier and our prettier config specifies single quotes: https://github.com/muxinc/media-chrome/blob/692be61a2a63ba98c7e449d860ce1828b78353a2/package.json#L106-L110
But for some reason this diff is showing a lot of conversions from single quotes to double quotes. That's just one example, but the broader point is that mis-matched linting & formatting is generating a larger diff than necessary.
Re-ran prettier and the quotes are fixed. There are other formatting changes, like print width, that were also applied using prettier's default values.
@littlespex I'm going to review the particular commits and see if we can identify any linting/formatting/prettier crud into a separate PR to make this easier.
This is an experiment in using Copilot and other tools to convert the code base to typescript. Remaining tasks: