Improve Prism Definition in Help Text

[moritzstaffel]

You can use the Preview tab ^ above to see final rendering of your report.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

[petrvanekrobe]

Sure, can you please be more specific on what the issue is? Do note that there is a detailed article on how to define Prisms in GDTF in the GDTF Help pages here.

[petrvanekrobe]

If the help pages have been missed and the issue is now obsolete, i think we can close it.

[moritzstaffel]

No just needed to find my notes what was wrong.

I think we need to add the the help page how the translation of the prims are defined. That they are defined by the beam size.

[petrvanekrobe]

The article lays it out pretty clearly, including examples:

...It is important to know what are the units used for the transformation. For the sake of simplicity, we can say here that the unit used in the matrix is "the radius of the unaltered beam". This sounds weird, so lets make an example...

https://gdtf-share.com/help/en/help/gdtf_how_to/key_defining,prism,facets.html

[moritzstaffel]

Yes, I think I would ad an "real world" image.

The description is pretty clear, but there was someone not understanding it.

I think that makes it more clear and easier to understand.

[petrvanekrobe]

OK, thank you.