This would be a really hard quiz with the potential for having more than one right answer.
I would serve up an increasing difficulty of hard arguments and the student would have to spot all of the flaws in the argument or choose the answer that explains why it's a good argument. I'd have 5-7 answer choices and some of them would have 2-3 correct choices.
It's in the future, but I think this type of drill would actually provide really great signal on which flaws the students are and are not seeing. Potentially a lot faster than just doing random LSAT problems, since argument evaluation is the core skill that everything else revolves around.
This would be a really hard quiz with the potential for having more than one right answer.
I would serve up an increasing difficulty of hard arguments and the student would have to spot all of the flaws in the argument or choose the answer that explains why it's a good argument. I'd have 5-7 answer choices and some of them would have 2-3 correct choices.
It's in the future, but I think this type of drill would actually provide really great signal on which flaws the students are and are not seeing. Potentially a lot faster than just doing random LSAT problems, since argument evaluation is the core skill that everything else revolves around.