Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Heidelberg:
reg. 1: will be done by the restructuring of the PSI-MS CV
reg. 2: seems to be difficult for a non-expert; makes CV maintenance much harder
Original comment by eisena...@googlemail.com
on 12 Apr 2011 at 10:12
1. This seems independent of the "restructuring". It's a large-scale term
obsoletion, not a movement of terms within the hierarchy.
2. Of course it's difficult for a non-expert, that's why we have a group of
experts maintaining the CV! :) In this case, I'm happy to go through the list
and make an "expert" decision as to which parameters change the search space,
at least for the search engines I know and/or the terms that are obviously
irrelevant.
Original comment by matt.cha...@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2011 at 1:29
Some of the discussion was necessary after we added the "ProteomeDiscoverer" CV
terms.
That generated three problems:
1) some of them had wrong "is_a" relations (now corrected in the CVS)
2) some of them repeat schema elements (like PMF mass tolerance)
3) some of them were not really "search engine" parameters, but have more to do
with spectra generation, spectra processing, data transformation etc. and
should be rectructured into other branches of the ontology. (see also mail to
David, Matt, Juan-Antonio and mailing list: we could correct also the CV terms
of problem 2), now or after clean-up).
Original comment by eisena...@googlemail.com
on 21 Apr 2011 at 4:54
Agreement in TeleCon 21.4.2011: THis seems to be a CV / obo issue, so it is set
to "Fixed" for the schema 1.1 release.
(feel free to un-fix it again)
Original comment by eisena...@googlemail.com
on 21 Apr 2011 at 4:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
matt.cha...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 4:47