Open RaphaelR87 opened 4 years ago
requires as JSON formatting of database
Provide a test case where the results are bad without mass filter and results are good with it.
Will require database from @ChungmaruQ. So we'll de-prioritize for now.
Provide a test case where the results are bad without mass filter and results are good with it.
In Hyunwoo's FP SMART version for example symmetric dimeric and thus magnetically equivalent compounds such as swinholide A would not be recognized, but only similar monomeric versions, because the number of HSQC correlations implies a structure only half the molecular weight.
When we had the mass filter it accurately assigned swinholide A as top1 result
so we can do that now, correct :)?
I don't want to confuse. I just wonder if we can add the mass filter for the current SMART2.0 version?