search

mwhooker / jsonselect

Python implementation of jsonselect (http://jsonselect.org/)
ISC License
26 stars 6 forks source link

Add support for Level 3 #1

Open prologic opened 10 years ago

prologic commented 10 years ago

Adding support for Level 3 would be nice. I plan to evaluate the use of your library in a production project at work. The spec seems fairly clear to me on Level 3 aspects. Not sure on "expressions" though.

mwhooker commented 10 years ago

Hi @therealprologic,

funny you should mention it. level 3 is something I plan on implementing this weekend.

@latestrevision implemented the level in go, which should be quite transferrable https://github.com/latestrevision/go-jsonselect

He also pointed me to this article which I hope should clear things up http://lloyd.io/jsonselect-grows-up

In the mean time, don't let me stop you from contributing any fixes you see

prologic commented 10 years ago

Thats fantastic news, Look forward to it!

Sent from my iPad

On 28 Nov 2013, at 15:53, Matthew Hooker notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi @therealprologic https://github.com/therealprologic,

funny you should mention it. level 3 is something I plan on implementing this weekend.

@latestrevision https://github.com/latestrevision implemented the level in go, which should be quite transferrable https://github.com/latestrevision/go-jsonselect

He also pointed me to this article which I hope should clear things up http://lloyd.io/jsonselect-grows-up

In the mean time, don't let me stop you from contributing any fixes you see

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mwhooker/jsonselect/issues/1#issuecomment-29441878 .

prologic commented 10 years ago

Hi @mwhooker just wondering if you are still working on this or have lost a bit of interest? Curious more than anything :)

prologic commented 10 years ago 
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_basic_multiple-has-with-strings]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_greater-than]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_less-than]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_mod]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_mult]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_null-eq]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_precedence-2]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_expr_simple-false]
FAIL tests/test_conformance.py::test[level_3_polykids_val]

So I've been trying to work on this but running into several issues:

prologic commented 10 years ago

ping @mwhooker

danvk commented 10 years ago

Since this project seems to have stalled, I've created a new one: pyjsonselect. It's based on the JS reference implementation and hence is fully conformant with all levels of the spec. If you need the level 3 selectors, you may wish to give it a try.

mwhooker commented 10 years ago

Hi All,

sorry for the radio silence. I'm no longer maintaining this, as there are far better solutions, such as http://www.jsoniq.org/ and https://github.com/boto/jmespath and now @danvk's pyjsonselect.

prologic commented 10 years ago

Awesome! Thanks guys :) I'll check these out!

James Mills / prologic

E: prologic@shortcircuit.net.au W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Matthew Hooker notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi All,

sorry for the radio silence. I'm no longer maintaining this, as there are far better solutions, such as http://www.jsoniq.org/ and https://github.com/boto/jmespath and now @danvk https://github.com/danvk's

pyjsonselect https://github.com/boto/jmespath.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/mwhooker/jsonselect/issues/1#issuecomment-58121860.