Open danodonovan opened 3 years ago
How would you feel about a PR for a matcher that checked if a value was NaN (for the numpy definition of NaN)?
NaN
Perhaps something like is_nan() ? (and using np.isnan under the hood).
is_nan()
np.isnan
NB By design NaN != NaN so equal_to(np.nan) wouldn't work here.
NaN != NaN
equal_to(np.nan)
Hmm, anything that relies on numpy should probably go in a separate module. I'm not opposed in principle though.
The alternative would be to add a more general is_ matcher, so you can write is_(np.nan).
is_
is_(np.nan)
How would you feel about a PR for a matcher that checked if a value was
NaN
(for the numpy definition ofNaN
)?Perhaps something like
is_nan()
? (and usingnp.isnan
under the hood).NB By design
NaN != NaN
soequal_to(np.nan)
wouldn't work here.