Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Relative names are not supported in relabelling (issue 73), but this still
doesn't work if you use f instead of f^1, so there may be a bug in the matcher.
Image.pig also demonstrates issue 23.
Original comment by adamgundry
on 10 Sep 2010 at 7:37
Sorry, I'm getting myself confused. Relabelling uses its own matching (because
one side is display syntax) and that side doesn't support applications yet,
though the matching for label search does. Obviously, this needs to change.
Original comment by adamgundry
on 10 Sep 2010 at 7:44
Fixed (as far as relabelling applications goes). See issue 73 for the issue of
names with de Bruijn indices.
http://www.e-pig.org/darcsweb/darcsweb?r=Pig09;a=commit;h=20100913113112-e29d1-2
283dca36ab16a1291d83ce62422918be3a5f1e6.gz
Original comment by adamgundry
on 13 Sep 2010 at 11:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pedag...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2010 at 3:11