mxsasha / nrtmv4

Ideas and work on the NRTM v4 protocol and implementations.
5 stars 7 forks source link

FInalise some terminology #4

Closed mxsasha closed 2 years ago

mxsasha commented 3 years ago

Unless someone contributes something better, I think we're sticking with these.

job commented 2 years ago

Let's call them RPSL objects

stkonst commented 2 years ago

I vote for "IRR objects" simply because we don't care in which language the objects are written. Today is RPSL, tomorrow something else.

mxsasha commented 2 years ago

As NRTMv4 is fairly agnostic to objects being RPSL, I also like IRR objects a bit more. I'll change it, we can always refine this one later if there is more discussion.