Closed seifferth closed 1 year ago
Interesting idea!
From the text of the documentation, it would appear that this might be desirable in action-tmate
's context.
However, I am relatively certain that we do not want -F
here:
tmate
session in the foreground, giving action-tmate
no chance to output the specific messages it wants to provideThat does sound like you have good reasons for doing what you're doing. It was just a quick idea anyhow. Thanks for the quick feedback and feel free to see this as resolved; from my point of view at least.
Best
Frank
See https://tmate.io/#remote_access. This particular commit is merely a suggestion, though. It is by no means a finished implementation – although it can serve as a working proof of concept.