Closed temujin9 closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your contribution! :)
This is functionally equivalent to a delete on the appropriate "blocking" at uri; it can be accomplished with that in the mean time.
Hi @temujin9 !
A block in Bluesky is represented as an atproto record
, this is the same as post and follow. So, since atproto supports a deleteRecord
endpoint (delete
command on bluesky_cli
) that can delete all records based on AT URIs with a common mechanism, there seems to me no need to implement unfollow
or unblock
.
A possible use case for deleting blocks with bluesky_cli
is to use the blocks
command to get a list of blocks and then delete a specific block. Then this list contains the AT URI for the block, so we could remove the block as follows :)
bsky delete --uri=at://........
Yep, that worked, thank you. This is mostly just for parity with the mute / unmute functionality; feel free to close it if not useful to you.
Packages/Tools
Proposal
Risks