Closed abhi18av closed 3 years ago
Maybe, this might not be necessary since this becomes a bit didactic.
We have already wrapped all individual steps of mtbseq
into NF processes/workflows and for advanced usage outlined in the issue description, advanced knowledge of NF is needed. Therefore, I think it might not be a good idea to overload the user with extra information.
Adding excerpts of discussion between @Mxrcon and @abhi18av
I think that we could assume that the user would start from the first step of the workflow and reach the last, so we can focus only on that.
To facilitate the advanced use-case where people want to use the intermediate steps, maybe we can add another workflow which starts from like step-2 or step-3 just to show them how to stitch it together.
This would need to be explained in Readme.md.