Closed neprune closed 3 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 69.02%. Comparing base (
8664dc6
) to head (af237d2
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Do we want the parent of the cobrand to be UKCouncils, is that needed as it's a totally standalone cobrand? I imagine there are plus/minus points either way - e.g. see HighwaysEngland/Thamesmead for the functions that had to be copied from UKCouncils (that code suggests a role) so that's awkward, but the parent has unnecessary stuff - e.g. the problem/user restrictions presumably aren't needed, nor all the national highways/munging etc bits that only really apply to cobrands. Just wanted to check this had been considered.
Initial cobrand setup.
Also closes https://github.com/mysociety/societyworks/issues/4340.