Closed neprune closed 3 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 82.84%. Comparing base (
ce80472
) to head (31f3032
). Report is 13 commits behind head on master.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
perllib/FixMyStreet/Cobrand/Bexley/Waste.pm | 75.00% | 0 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hi @neprune @chrismytton , Have pushed what I think is a simpler fix 🤞 though we may need to revisit this or put it on hold until we get clarification on the question I asked here
Hi @neprune @chrismytton , Have pushed what I think is a simpler fix 🤞 though we may need to revisit this or put it on hold until we get clarification on the question I asked here
Nice, I thought doing the filtering after the original iteration would be more readable but your fixup reads nicely to me, and is obviously more performant.
Not sure if it matters, but if we wanted to be consistent in which service we choose when two clash, we could order the iteration by service code alphabetically, or similar.
Not sure if it matters, but if we wanted to be consistent in which service we choose when two clash, we could order the iteration by service code alphabetically, or similar.
Yeah, I have wondered if we ought to be sorting services before we do any filtering - I'll see what Bexley come back with because some services are 'identical' containers but actually have different collection dates :-/
The rotation schedule text change has been done in #5014, so that doesn't need to be done in this PR, but the rest looks good to me!
Bluh, I will remove!
[skip changelog]
closes https://github.com/mysociety/societyworks/issues/4346
This also includes a small change that removes the word 'rotation' before 'schedule'.