Live use of MVP - Githubissues

mysociety / transparency-fnf-whatdotheyknow-projects

Issues repository for the Nesta Future News Fund "WhatDoTheyKnow Projects" project

0 stars 0 forks source link

Live use of MVP #35

Closed garethrees closed 4 years ago

garethrees commented 4 years ago

Live use of MVP by wider membership group in each partner organisation - around 10 per org. tbd with partners

garethrees commented 4 years ago

First round of feedback from a contributor:

Briefing is clear, and obvious what to do when you start classifying
Organisation of classification options could be clearer
Add a notes field to classification form
Tried to click through to an attached PDF and it didn't work (We didn't see an exception notification, so possibly permissions?)
Clicking into an attachment and then navigating back results in a new random request

garethrees commented 4 years ago

A contributor was having trouble joining.

Looks like they clicked the /projects/1/ URL where we say "To join this project, create an account or sign in". They created an account but then got a CanCan::AccessDenied error because they weren't a contributor, so that's all a bit confusing.

Maybe need a custom handler for CanCan::AccessDenied within Projects that says something like "You need an invite token to join this project".

garethrees commented 4 years ago

Bit of minor feedback

Everything seemed fine to me. Tried classifying a few responses and extracting data; didn’t come across any errors.

garethrees commented 4 years ago

Some more positive feedback.

Really enjoying working on the project (!)
Minor clarification issues in the briefing
Guidance / options on the classification form really helpful

garethrees commented 4 years ago

A bit more feedback

It would be good to get a sense from contributors why might a FOI request be refused/what exemptions the authorities are relying upon. Then as a project owner, I could see whether there is a common theme (e.g. cost grounds), or whether there are other exemptions at play which might need my attention (e.g. data protection, commercial interests etc.) and I would need to ask for an internal review.

Seems like a case for a general notes field during classification.

garethrees commented 4 years ago

Some more feedback.

Main points summarised from all 3:

Very clear instructions, intuitive, easy to use
Difficult to understand what "interesting" means (in the context of the extraction questions)
Be good to be able to add which exemption was applied to a refusal

garethrees commented 4 years ago

Some really detailed feedback around classifications.