Open mzur opened 2 years ago
Is it different? it should be exactly the same now, they use the same code.
Default switcher:
Wsmatrix:
oh, this is going to be quite hard.
wsmatrix
now extends SwitcherPopup
instead of WorkspaceSwitcherPopup
both parents extend St.Widget
, but each has its own way of constructing the popup.
I tried to just bring back the style classes from WorkspaceSwitcherPopup
but that showed a very bad style and the indicator wasn't even visible.
Maybe we will need to look more into this but I think it's low priority issue. The only thing here is that wsmatrix
will get the style from other switchers like the app switcher
rather than the workspaces switcher
. This actually helped us a lot because theme developers take into account the app switcher
which shows icons of the app (similar to thumbnails), but never take into consideration the possibility of thumbnails existing in the WorkspaceSwitcherPopup
which caused the usability styling issues we had with some themes.
In case we need to get this back, I suggest we keep trying having one switcher popup class
for both with or without thumbnails.
GNOME 42 uses a new switcher popup style with dots at the bottom. I'd like to use this style for our popup without thumbnails (if someone is willing to implement it).
The switcher popup without thumbnails should have the same style/look than the default switcher popup.