Closed adrianwong closed 3 years ago
Alternatively, we could imitate the regex for _ra_
and say
_coeng_ = The sign "Coeng"
or something to that effect?
The intent was likely to mimic the _ra_
approach, but in this case I think I like the INVISIBLE_STACKER
better, since it preserves that property in reader-accessible form. Doesn't make a difference, number-wise, since there's only one either way, but it's more cautious, which seems to be wise considering the complexity of Khmer and the potential for more changes coming.
U+17D2 KHMER SIGN COENG has the shaping class
INVISIBLE_STACKER
, notCOENG
.