Open sconway-datto opened 2 years ago
SSLyze is going to switch to pyOpenSSL for path validation (https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze/issues/566) so the leaky code will not be used by SSLyze anymore. This is a comment I had put for troubleshooting the memory leak in nassl:
# TODO(AD): There is probably a memory leak in nassl.X509 or nassl.X509_STORE_CTX
# https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze/issues/560
# It might be due to bad reference counting in nassl_X509_STORE_CTX_set0_trusted_stack()
# More specifically the call to X509_chain_up_ref() - is there corresponding call to decrease ref count?
# As a workaround, we cache the (huge) list of trusted certificates, for each trust store
Continuing the conversation from this SSLyze issue: https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze/issues/560
In the following comment, I showed a simple test script that would illustrate that the nassl functions set0_trusted_stack and set0_untrusted appear to have memory leaks. Run as-is, the script will provide empty lists to both functions and leak memory.
https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze/issues/560#issuecomment-1108955907