Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I also have tested it on Mozilla Firefox 7.0.1 and the same bug acurre.
Original comment by th2...@gmail.com
on 29 Oct 2011 at 2:40
I have looked at this issue using FireBug and discovered that the cause is that
the code in layouts/_header.html.erb (as follows):
<%= stylesheet_link_tag @extjs_base_url + '/resources/css/ext-all.css' %>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag 'application' %>
<%= javascript_include_tag @extjs_base_url + '/adapter/ext/ext-base.js' %>
<%= javascript_include_tag @extjs_base_url + '/ext-all.js' %>
<%= javascript_include_tag 'application' %>
<%= javascript_include_tag '/ext/locale/ext-lang-' + I18n.locale.to_s + '.js' %>
Is rendered in the HTML as:
<link href="/ext/resources/css/ext-all.css?1285488870" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="/stylesheets/application.css?1302428434" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script src="/ext/adapter/ext/ext-base.js?1285488870" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/ext/ext-all.js?1285488870" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/javascripts/application.js?1299943460" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/ext/locale/ext-lang-en.js?1285488870" type="text/javascript"></script>
If you try to access: /ext/resources/css/ext-all.css?1285488870 directly you
get the error:
Internal Server Error
private method `gsub!' called for #<Class:0xb7042a74>
WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/1.8.5/2006-08-25)
The reason for this is that WEBrick is expecting aURL of the form
{URL}?{parameter}={value}
rather than {URL}?{value}
If you try to access /ext/resources/css/ext-all.css?number=1285488870 then you
get the text returned as you would expect. Alternatively adding = to the end of
the number works as well.
There must be some difference n the way these URLs are being encoded by Firefox
compared with, say Chrome.
I have not checked out the stylesheet_link_tag or javascript_include_tag code,
but I assume if this were modified to include an = then this would fix it.
On the other hand, I would not expect to see this kind of cache busting URL
parameter in use on production systems, and the preferred solution for a
non-development installation would be to omit the ?1285488870 part entirely.
With best regards, Pehr
Original comment by pehr.tor...@gmail.com
on 29 Nov 2011 at 9:58
The cause of this is as follows:
6.4 AssetTag Timestamp Caching
You’re likely familiar with Rails’ practice of adding timestamps to static
asset paths as a “cache buster.” This helps ensure that stale copies of
things like images and stylesheets don’t get served out of the user’s
browser cache when you change them on the server. You can now modify this
behavior with the cache_asset_timestamps configuration option for Action View.
If you enable the cache, then Rails will calculate the timestamp once when it
first serves an asset, and save that value. This means fewer (expensive) file
system calls to serve static assets – but it also means that you can’t
modify any of the assets while the server is running and expect the changes to
get picked up by clients.
This can be disabled with: ENV['RAILS_ASSET_ID'] = ""
for example in environment.rb
Original comment by pehr.tor...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2011 at 8:38
I can confirm that setting ENV['RAILS_ASSET_ID'] = ""
in
/opt/ovz-web-panel/config/environment.rb
solves this problem with FireFox 8.0.1
You will have to restart OVZ Web Panel to get this to work:
/opt/ovz-web-panel/script/owp restart
If you upgrade OVZ Web Panel, it may be necessary to clear your browser cache
to
ensure you get the latest code, since setting ENV['RAILS_ASSET_ID'] to "" turns
off
the cache busting effect of the links. However, since you only have to do this
once
for any given upgrade, this should not be a problem.
I suggest that OVZ Web Panel is shipped with ENV['RAILS_ASSET_ID'] = "" and a
note to
this effect.
With best regards, Pehr
Original comment by pehr.tor...@gmail.com
on 4 Dec 2011 at 5:43
Solved! Thanks a lot!
Original comment by th2...@gmail.com
on 4 Dec 2011 at 5:47
Original comment by sibprogrammer
on 5 Dec 2011 at 4:23
Guys, see no reason to workaround this problem for Ruby 1.8.5! Really it's very
old version of Ruby.
Original comment by sibprogrammer
on 20 Feb 2012 at 2:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
th2...@gmail.com
on 29 Oct 2011 at 2:35