Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Due to performance issues we only show layergroups in MA State Plane custom
projection so print would need to be limited to that. But that might happen
automatically since layergroups are specified in the folderset XML as
only_project="EPSG:26986".
Original comment by Aleda.Fr...@state.ma.us
on 17 Dec 2012 at 5:48
I am adding a different, working Permalink with a layergroup:
http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/map_ol/oliver.php?lyrs=MassDEP%20Title5%20Map~ma
ssgis_dep_title5~&bbox=-70.96670703295567,42.643259524465876,-70.93267794033284,
42.65197305368695&coordUnit=m&measureUnit=m&base=custom¢er=245127.54619312,9331
49.93769828&zoom=9.272727272727273&opacity=1&baseO=1&filt=undefined
The layergroup name is massgis_dep_title5
In the OLIVER folderset the line is:
<Layer title="MassDEP Title5 Map" style="" name="massgis_dep_title5"
type="layergroup"/>
The previous sample used the layergroup massgis_basemap which is no longer
available (we dropped it in favor of our new tilesets).
Original comment by Aleda.Fr...@state.ma.us
on 24 Jun 2013 at 3:12
I had taken the only_project="EPSG:26986" in the folderset off the DEP
layergroups at their request. While with the massgis_basemap the reproject too
much too long, with the DEP layergroups which have fewer datalayers in them
they were OK with waiting and then eventually getting the map while in
non-26986 basemaps such as Google. So to adjust what I initially said above
layergroups should print in any basemap situation.
Original comment by Aleda.Fr...@state.ma.us
on 24 Jun 2013 at 3:22
Aleda, I may be imagining things, but when I visit the link you provided and
hit print, I see a nice image on my printable page.
I'm not sure how long this will last,
http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/temp/OL_MORIS_print/1372171143.569300877.html.
Original comment by cpl...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2013 at 2:40
Huh, I have to agree, it prints for me.
I'm going to also try it with only_project="EPSG:26986" added to the folderset.
That works too.
Guess I'll mark this one "invalid" since it's not really a bug...
Original comment by Aleda.Fr...@state.ma.us
on 25 Jun 2013 at 3:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Aleda.Fr...@state.ma.us
on 17 Aug 2012 at 1:11