dual inverter

[arno58]

I would like to use your docker image but i have two inverters. I could create two docker two docker images but they would run in to sharing conflicts.

ps I found a dock image (bigrob8181/monitor) who uses

network_mode: host
cap_add:
  - NET_ADMIN

to create a secure docker image with access to bluetooth device

[nakla]

Hi, you only need network_mode: host - NET_ADMIN is not necessary (you can see that in my docker-compose.yaml example at the end of the readme). You can configure 2 inverters simply in the configfile. I believe you just have to set BTAddress to one of your inverters, and set the MTS_Enabled variable to 1. In both inverters, you have to set the same ID - mine have a rotary switch, but they were set to the same id already in factory, just in case the is different in your ones.

[arno58]

Thank you for your quick response. A) i thought that extra parameter was meant to limit root access to only network devices, i will check the running processes. B) all the solar panels are on my roof, one inverter is owned by my neighbour and stored in different pvoutput accounts; if there is a difference between them i get an Allert.

Op za 18 nov. 2023 01:03 schreef nakla @.***>:

Hi, you only need network_mode: host - NET_ADMIN is not necessary (you can see that in my docker-compose.yaml example at the end of the readme). You can configure 2 inverters simply in the configfile. I believe you just have to set BTAddress to one of your inverters, and set the MTS_Enabled variable to 1. In both inverters, you have to set the same ID - mine have a rotary switch, but they were set to the same id already in factory, just in case the is different in your ones.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nakla/sbfspot/issues/20#issuecomment-1817270497, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOQKNBN5VIO6ZHGKVUWTXFLYE73OZAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7QQCE2WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJXGI3TANBZG4 . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[nakla]

Ok, I don't use pvoutput, I don't know if the upload can handle two accounts in one instance. I believe you find informations about it in the docu. If that is not possible, you can simply run two instances of the sbfspot container with two separate uploads.

[nakla]

Problem seems to be solved...