@nalimilan, this would allow additional types where we don't know even at runtime if they're a valid "table" or not. Tables.columns itself will throw an error if the input is indeed not a table.
Coverage remained the same at 92.754% when pulling cbad4c28893f4361498b6fc05677db94dfa93041 on quinnj:patch-1 into 298a6557e8a4b7a08306c806229a907410ee3d8d on nalimilan:master.
Coverage remained the same at 92.754% when pulling cbad4c28893f4361498b6fc05677db94dfa93041 on quinnj:patch-1 into 298a6557e8a4b7a08306c806229a907410ee3d8d on nalimilan:master.
Coverage remained the same at 92.754% when pulling cbad4c28893f4361498b6fc05677db94dfa93041 on quinnj:patch-1 into 298a6557e8a4b7a08306c806229a907410ee3d8d on nalimilan:master.
@nalimilan, this would allow additional types where we don't know even at runtime if they're a valid "table" or not.
Tables.columns
itself will throw an error if the input is indeed not a table.