9:17 PM <sugarpuff> Jeremy_Rand: namecoin could fork some parts of it
9:17 PM <sugarpuff> like the auto-renewal stuff
9:17 PM <•Jeremy_Rand> sugarpuff: yes. I think the idea of Namecoin forking the part of it that interacts with the CA, is something that has come up.
9:18 PM <•Jeremy_Rand> can't remember when/where it came up. Probably some random convo on IRC. Like this.
9:18 PM <•Jeremy_Rand> sugarpuff: if you'd like to start a ticket on the GitHub namecoin/meta repo for that idea, that would improve chances that someone will remember it later
auto-renewal
"parts [that interact] with the CA"
---
Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/20885704-forking-parts-of-let-s-encrypt?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6562918&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6562918&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).